Monday, December 24, 2007
How to earn 300% in a global credit crunch
Article 1
Article 2
Cheers,
Manpreet
Buffett's stock picks in the aftermath of the Credit Crunch
On Wells Fargo and Its Derivatives Risk [A shareholder asked why Buffett felt comfortable owning Wells Fargo stock, and even buying more, given its exposure to derivatives. Buffett replied:]
WB:I don’t have Wells Fargo’s annual report here, but I’d bet that J.P. Morgan Chase is far larger [in terms of exposure to derivatives]. I don’t think of them [Wells Fargo] as being a big player in the derivatives game.
It's clear that Buffett has made use of Mr Market's recent mood swings to buy well managed good businesses at attractive prices.With his cumulative knowledge built up over the years reading annual reports, it seem almost intuitive to purchase these companies..
Here is a link to his most recent stock purchases
In addition, here are his most recent comments about the recent turbulence in the financial markets and how he approaches it
WB:It is the nature of capitalism to periodically have recessions. People overshoot. So, it isn't the end of the world. I mean, as a matter of fact, for an investor, you know, it turns out to be the times when you make your best buys. I made by far the best buys I've ever made in my lifetime in 1974. And that was a time of great pessimism and the oil shock and stagflation and all those sort of things. But stocks were cheap.
Guess it's time to start digging through all those 10ks and 10qs
Cheers,
Manpreet
Monday, November 26, 2007
Mathematicians' role in market mayhem
Here is an excerpt
"Paul Wilmott is someone with privileged access to the usually secretive world of the quants.
He runs a website where quants discuss mathematical problems and can watch lectures on quantitative finance 24 hours a day. He talks regularly to those working in a wide range of banks and hedge funds.
He believes the accusation that many banks use the same models is true: "The way in which quants are compensated encourages them to use the same strategies as everyone else."
He claims that many quants calculate that if they lose money as a result of following a novel strategy they will be fired.
However, if they lose money as a result of following the same strategy as everyone else, they will not get the blame.
"The problem with this," says Mr Wilmott, "is that if something bad happens, it happens across the board."
Consumer benefits
Another problem, according to Mr Wilmott, is that academically trained mathematicians are more used to modelling sound physical principles than difficult-to-predict financial markets:
With finance you are essentially modelling human beings which is much more tricky."
Here is the link to the entire article
Using the Graham-Dodd-Buffett framework,one gets a clear perspective into the psychology of financial markets and human behaviour.Instead of relying on overpaid quants, Buffett in a gist gives us all we need to succeed as successful investors.
Amazingly,Buffett reveals this priceless piece of wisdom when he was just 21 years old while lecturing a group of students at night time classes
Timeless piece of advice...
Cheers,
Manpreet
Monday, October 08, 2007
Leverage is not for the faint hearted
Highly leveraged yen carry trade makes the prospect of financial tsunami more real. Due to the thin spread between currencies, traders have to use leverage in order to realize profits to justify the enormous risks in currency trading. For example, a trader borrows 1000 yen from a bank and converts the funds into US dollars and buys a bond with that amount. Assuming that the bond pays 5.0% and the Japanese interest rate is set at 0.25%, the trader makes a profit of 475 bps. However, using leverage can reward the trader very handsomely. If he uses leverage with a factor of 10:1, he can stand make a profit of 47.5% provided if the exchange rate remains stable.
In the financial markets, it’s often difficult to measure the size of such carry trades as they involve several currencies. Compounding the already bad situation is the use of swaps, derivatives and futures. Given the increasing diversity of the trades, even seasoned market watchers are unable to predict the next sudden unwinding of the yen carry trade.
1) Underwriting. Using actuarial science to help quantify risks and determine how much to charge for the insurance policy being underwritten.
2) Investing the premiums from the insurance policies. The insurance companies earn
returns by investing the “float” into a portfolio of equities and bonds
Given the zero interests rates environment, insurance companies were forced to invest abroad in higher yielding assets.
Cheers,
Manpreet
Friday, May 18, 2007
Time to turn bearish
With the Dow Jones Industrial Average moving from 11000 to 13 556 levels, the Nasdaq composite moving from 2000 to 2500 and the S&P moving from around 1200 to 1522 over the last one year or so, It is not hard to conceive that the market might just go into a recession soon. To be honest, we don't know when but when it happens, it might just be one big market correction ahead.
Firstly, although i am not much a fan of economics, i have to admit that the twin deficits in the US might just cause US to go into recession. When that happens, the whole world will fall alongside the US too.
In China, the stock markets have been overheated for a while now in my opinion. In india too, ordinary folks are rushing to open brokerage accounts to capitalize on the booming indian market and the ever rising stock prices of indian equity which seem to have no ceilings.
In fact, across all markets right now, when you start seeing companies with PE ratios of 40 and above, one should start to get scared. I can never imagine paying for companies with PEs of 40 and above. Standards of valuation just don't justify such high mulitples. But the thing is that people are doing it, loving every moment of it.
Bail out slowly people. Be conservative. Live to fight another day. It is simply a matter of time before the world market corrects. When that happens, be ready for it.
With that i leave you with a quote from Warren Buffet: We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.
Better and better,
Lucas
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Diversification - How many stocks to own?
I won't say that i am right but i am am definitely of the opinion that diversification really can affect your investing results. To have better results, i feel that one must learn to pick their spots.
The sole purpose of diversification is to reduce non market risk which is risk inherent in a certain stock. An example of non market risk is fires in the company factory or when a particular product is not selling as well. This has to be differentiated from market risk. Market risk is the risk of being in the market. If the market drops, your portfolio drops as well and i doubt there is nothing you can do to aviod that kind of risk.
That being said, what is the optimum number of stocks that one should have in their portfolio? Statistics say that owning 2 stocks help eliminate the non market risk of owning just 1 stock. This risk is reduced by 72 % with 4 stocks in the portfolio and further reduced by 81 percent with 8 stocks. 93% is further shaved off with 16 stocks and, 96 % with 32 stocks and 99% with 500 stocks.
As you can see, you need not own many stocks. Above 8 stocks, diversification does not add much incremental benefit in the for of lowered non market risk. Hence i opine that 8 stocks is a good number. In fact, 6 - 10 is a great number to own. Another advantage of owning a lesser number of stocks is that you have more time to focus on the portfolio.
Cheers,
Lucas